🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are watching closely to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' innocence". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to enact a bill increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding statement calling for a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a good foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, momentum built behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. A prominent charity established by the family of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts contends that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are secure and fit for minors," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is largely unfolding at the regional government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further use dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring parental consent for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to follow this path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Apart from the West, other nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this global debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.