🔗 Share this article

For months, coercive phone calls continued. At first, allegedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a former defense officer, later from law enforcement directly. Finally, one resident asserts he was summoned to the police station and instructed bluntly: stop speaking out or experience severe repercussions.

The leather artisan is among those opposing a multimillion-dollar initiative where Dharavi – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – will be demolished and transformed by a corporate giant.

"The distinctive community of Dharavi is unparalleled in the globe," states the resident. "However they want to dismantle our community and silence our voices."

Contrasting Realities

The narrow alleys of the slum sit in stark contrast to the soaring skyscrapers and elite residences that overshadow the settlement. Residences are built haphazardly and frequently lacking adequate facilities, small-scale operations produce dangerous fumes and the air is permeated by the suffocating smell of open sewers.

To some, the promise of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of luxury high-rises, organized recreational areas, shiny shopping centers and residences with two toilets is an optimistic future realized.

"There's no proper healthcare, roads or drainage and there's nowhere for children to play," explains a tea vendor, fifty-six, who relocated from southern India in 1982. "The only way is to demolish everything and construct proper housing."

Community Resistance

Yet certain residents, such as this protester, are fighting against the project.

All recognize that the slum, historically ignored as informal housing, is urgently needing investment and development. But they fear that this project – without public consultation – might convert premium city property into an elite enclave, forcing out the marginalized, working-class residents who have been there since generations ago.

This involved these marginalized, relocated individuals who built up the empty marshland into an extensively researched phenomenon of community resilience and economic productivity, whose production is estimated at between $1m and two million dollars annually, making it among the globe's biggest unregulated sectors.

Resettlement Issues

Of the roughly 1 million people living in the dense 220-hectare area, a minority will be eligible for new homes in the project, which is projected to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. Others will be transferred to wastelands and saline fields on the distant periphery of the metropolis, potentially divide a generations-old social network. Certain individuals will not get residences at all.

People eligible to continue living in the neighborhood will be given apartments in high-rise buildings, a significant rupture from the natural, collective approach of living and working that has supported Dharavi for generations.

Businesses from garment work to pottery and waste processing are likely to shrink in number and be moved to an allocated "business area" far from people's residences.

Existential Threat

In the case of this protester, a workshop owner and long-time of his family to call home Dharavi, the redevelopment presents a fundamental risk. His rickety, three-storey facility makes garments – tailored coats, luxury coats, decorated jackets – distributed in high-end shops in the city's affluent areas and overseas.

His family resides in the accommodations underneath and his workers and garment workers – laborers from other states – reside there, permitting him to sustain operations. Outside the slum, housing costs are frequently 10 times costlier for basic accommodation.

Pressure and Coercion

At the official facilities close by, an illustrated mock-up of the redevelopment plan illustrates a very different perspective. Fashionable residents mill about on cycles and eco-friendly transport, purchasing western-style baked goods and pastries and enlisting beverages on a patio near Dharavi Cafe and Ice-Cream. This represents a world away from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and 5-rupee chai that maintains the neighborhood.

"This isn't development for us," states Shaikh. "It represents an enormous land development that will render it impossible for us to survive."

There is also distrust of the corporate group. Run by a prominent businessman – a leading figure and an associate of the Indian prime minister – the business group has been subject to claims of favoritism and questionable practices, which it denies.

Although the state government calls it a joint project, the corporation invested a significant amount for its 80% stake. A case alleging that the redevelopment was unfairly awarded to the developer is pending in the top court.

Sustained Harassment

Since they began to actively protest the development, protesters and community members assert they have been experienced an extended period of harassment and intimidation – involving phone calls, explicit warnings and implications that criticizing the initiative was equivalent to anti-national sentiment – by figures they claim work for the business conglomerate.

Part of the group alleged to have issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c