🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year backed Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That really surprised me. The independent kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.